Is your set-it-and-forget-it hedging strategy bad for business?
Industry Updates

Is your set-it-and-forget-it hedging strategy bad for business?

Subscribe  to receive the latest Mobius research & updates

By Mohit Arora
Industry Updates

A frequent comment we hear from our clients and the industry is that “We are in the hedging business and not the trading business; once we hedge, we leave those hedges alone”. What I would like to contemplate are the following questions in broad terms:  

  • If I restructure hedges, am I trading or optimizing?
  • “Set it and forget it” is a decision – is it optimal?
  • Can we do better through objective data-informed decision making such that we raise the expected value of our enterprise?

 

Let’s start with the first two on the list above using everyday examples.  

 

Suppose we bought a $30k car in 2015, which depreciated to $15k in Jan 2020. With Covid and supply chain issues, the price appreciated to $25k in Dec 2022. A new car is still selling near its MSRP at $32k. We could do nothing. Or we could sell our used car at $25k (locking in that gain), buy a new car at $32k, and be confident that if markets return to normal, we have a newer car, have crystallized our gains, and very likely have increased our portfolio value (for a small premium paid – the difference between the old and new car).  

 

Another example comes from air travel. Suppose I, as a student, have a flight to Europe on June 15th. However, the airline overbooked for summer travel, and offers me two sweeteners if I take the next flight out – that this trip is now free, and that I have $500 in cash for a future trip. I could turn down the offer for no gain. Or I could take up the airline offer in which case I have increased my personal portfolio value (for a small premium – the inconvenience of going on a later flight and the wasted time).

 

The last example I’ll share is from housing. Let’s pretend we wanted to buy a house in 2022-2023 but found that renting was 50% cheaper. We could just buy the house since that is our goal. Or we could rent for a few years, knowing that at some point, the buying vs renting gap will close and we can buy the house then (premium – inconvenience).

 

In each case above, we can be “static,” or we can optimize our decision in a manner that increases our expected portfolio value. As we observed above, the static decision is sub-optimal in each case unless we have additional constraints, such as:

  • No money to pay the difference between the new car and the inflated value of the used car
  • No flexibility in travel since we could be going for a wedding, or have inflexible onward plans
  • Money is not an issue and we have found our dream house  

Getting back to hedging. We can decide that restructuring of hedges is off the table (“set it and forget it”) or that hedges can be thoughtfully reconstructed. While we are not adding risk, we could open additional upside and/or increase our downside protection, while increasing the expected value of our enterprise. As we saw in the everyday examples, the static solution is sub-optimal, unless there are additional constraints.  

However, if we did decide to restructure our derivative portfolio, how do we accomplish that in a data-informed objective manner?  

Mobius Hedge Strategy in Action

Consider a client who executed a collar strategy because they correctly felt there was upside in the market. Fast forward a few months and prices are significantly higher than when the collar was initiated. Not doing anything (“Set it and forget it”) is a higher risk decision, since prices could easily drop down to where they were earlier, leading to a sub-optimal outcome. A simple restructuring could be to convert it to a swap at these higher prices for a small premium outlay, but which locks in these higher prices. What needs to be determined is the cost/benefit of this restructuring – the premium paid relative to the incremental price achieved.

 

The premium paid frequently leads to pushback. Going back to our everyday examples: we don’t shy from paying a “fare lock” to lock in attractive air fares and we often pay an “option” to lock in the purchase of a house we like. Should we hesitate to pay a small premium to lock in attractive hedges or restructure existing hedges into better ones?  

 

The key is evaluating the attractiveness of this restructuring, which depends on an objective determination of whether price, volatility and skew are cheap or expensive, and its impact on portfolio risk. This is precisely where Mobius excels – helping our clients reach data-informed knowledge-based risk management decisions efficiently, consistent with client objectives and capital plans, while maintaining the client’s risk-reductive strategy.

Mohit Arora

Mohit Arora

Roles and Responsibilities

Mohit leads the Risk Analytics and Decision Sciences group at Mobius. His primary role is to help Mobius’ clients make quicker, data-informed, knowledge-based risk management decisions that have a high probability of success. He works closely with the Strategy team to develop optimal hedge strategies for clients, and to efficiently manage the client portfolio derivative exposure. Mohit developed M-RiskTM, Mobius’ proprietary risk evaluation process, as well as several statistical tools that quantify and rank the factors driving hedge attractiveness. Knowing where the risk sits, where the attractive hedge opportunities lie, coupled with the knowledge of client financial objectives, risk tolerance and capital plans, leads to efficient hedging with the highest probability of success for the client.

Prior Experience

Before joining Mobius in 2018, Mohit was heading the options desk at Koch Supply & Trading, where he was managing a proprietary crude and products option book. He was also responsible for managing the portfolio tail risk for the physical crude, products, fuel, NGL and Ags desks, which he accomplished using options. Prior to Koch, he was a portfolio manager at AAA Capital Management, managing an oil options trading strategy based both on fundamentals and quantitative analysis. He moved to AAA from Entergy Koch/Merrill Lynch Commodities, where he developed and traded proprietary natural gas option strategies. Additionally, he proposed trade structures and enhanced return/index strategies to hedge funds and was the primary hedge structurer for corporate clients (producers, consumers, and refiners).  

Professional Experience

  • Koch Supply and Trading, Head of Proprietary Options Desk
    AAA Capital Management, Portfolio Manager
    Merrill Lynch Commodities, Lead structurer for Producers/Consumers/Refiners and Hedge Funds
    Entergy Koch Trading, Natural Gas Option Trader
    Koch Hydrocarbons, Quantitative Analyst and NGL trader

Education

  • Btech, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur
  • MS Aerospace Engineering, University of Michigan Ann Arbor
  • Dual PhD (Aerospace Engineering and Scientific Computing), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Read more